首页> 外文OA文献 >Epidemiologic Background of Hand Hygiene and Evaluation of the Most Important Agents for Scrubs and Rubs
【2h】

Epidemiologic Background of Hand Hygiene and Evaluation of the Most Important Agents for Scrubs and Rubs

机译:手卫生的流行病学背景和对磨砂膏的最重要成分的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The etiology of nosocomial infections, the frequency of contaminated hands with the different nosocomial pathogens, and the role of health care workers' hands during outbreaks suggest that a hand hygiene preparation should at least have activity against bacteria, yeasts, and coated viruses. The importance of efficacy in choosing the right hand hygiene product is reflected in the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline on hand hygiene (J. M. Boyce and D. Pittet, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 51:1-45, 2002). The best antimicrobial efficacy can be achieved with ethanol (60 to 85%), isopropanol (60 to 80%), and n-propanol (60 to 80%). The activity is broad and immediate. Ethanol at high concentrations (e.g., 95%) is the most effective treatment against naked viruses, whereas n-propanol seems to be more effective against the resident bacterial flora. The combination of alcohols may have a synergistic effect. The antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine (2 to 4%) and triclosan (1 to 2%) is both lower and slower. Additionally, both agents have a risk of bacterial resistance, which is higher for chlorhexidine than triclosan. Their activity is often supported by the mechanical removal of pathogens during hand washing. Taking the antimicrobial efficacy and the mechanical removal together, they are still less effective than the alcohols. Plain soap and water has the lowest efficacy of all. In the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline, promotion of alcohol-based hand rubs containing various emollients instead of irritating soaps and detergents is one strategy to reduce skin damage, dryness, and irritation. Irritant contact dermatitis is highest with preparations containing 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, less frequent with nonantimicrobial soaps and preparations containing lower concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate, and lowest with well-formulated alcohol-based hand rubs containing emollients and other skin conditioners. Too few published data from comparative trials are available to reliably rank triclosan. Personnel should be reminded that it is neither necessary nor recommended to routinely wash hands after each application of an alcohol-based hand rub. Long-lasting improvement of compliance with hand hygiene protocols can be successful if an effective and accessible alcohol-based hand rub with a proven dermal tolerance and an excellent user acceptability is supplied, accompanied by education of health care workers and promotion of the use of the product.
机译:医院感染的病因,受不同医院病原体污染的手的频率以及爆发期间医护人员的手的作用表明,手卫生制剂至少应具有抵抗细菌,酵母菌和包膜病毒的活性。新的疾病控制和预防中心关于手部卫生的指南反映了选择右手卫生产品的有效性的重要性(JM Boyce和D. Pittet,Morb。Mortal。Wkly。Rep。51:1-45,2002) 。使用乙醇(60%至85%),异丙醇(60%至80%)和正丙醇(60%至80%)可获得最佳的抗菌效果。活动是广泛而直接的。高浓度(例如95%)的乙醇是对抗裸露病毒的最有效方法,而正丙醇似乎对驻留的细菌菌群更有效。醇的组合可以具有协同作用。洗必太(2-4%)和三氯生(1-2%)的抗菌效果既低又慢。另外,两种药物都有细菌耐药性的风险,对氯己定的耐药性高于三氯生。它们的活性通常由洗手过程中机械去除病原体来支持。结合抗菌功效和机械去除效果,它们仍然不如醇有效。普通肥皂和水的功效最低。在新的疾病控制与预防中心指南中,促进使用含有各种润肤剂而不刺激肥皂和清洁剂的酒精基手擦是减少皮肤损伤,干燥和刺激的一种策略。含4%葡萄糖酸洗必泰的刺激性接触性皮炎最高,非抗菌皂的使用频率较低,而葡萄糖酸洗必泰的浓度更低,而含有软化剂和其他皮肤调理剂的酒精基手揉搓配方则最低。比较试验的公开数据很少,无法可靠地对三氯生进行排名。应当提醒工作人员,每次使用酒精基洗手液后,都没有必要或建议定期洗手。如果能够提供有效且可及的酒精类手磨砂膏,并证明其具有良好的皮肤耐受性,并且能够为用户提供出色的接受性,并伴随着对医护人员的教育和对使用方法的促进,则可以持久地改善对手部卫生规程的遵守。产品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号